Search results

LOL

I mean the important thing is just having a rational discussion about QB decision making. Having never played the position, I find the thought process and speed of decision making a worthy subject. Unfortunately, some people to start going to their corners and making it about individuals and...

I didn’t take your post as a shot to Kosi. I though you made a fair post. We can criticize play without taking shots, it’s just that a lot of people on this site don’t know how to criticize without being asshœles about it.

I guarantee there is. Each one of those guys had bad reads and bad throws in the spring. Even if they were all Americans they would’ve had some bad reads/throws. I just haven’t had a snippet come across my timeline like this where you had at least two maybe even three possible choices clearly...

Injuries can change everything.

What level did you play at?

Good post but that’s bad juju pulling Jay Cutler out of your hat. I don’t agree about Kosi though...I think he’s right there and it wouldn’t surprise me if he gets the job. I don’t disagree if people say he’s an inch ahead He did a great job sliding up and threading the needle, but tactically I...

You just keep proving you are the one with the agenda. You want one guy to win and the **** with the other guys. You’re a piece of shlt and you just proved it, queerboy. There are some guys that are just as ***** on Tate. Apparently not as many on Williams. Fūck all of them.

Why? Because I was scrolling through twitter and this jumped out at me. I didn’t go look for it, it was in my timeline. Had it been from Tate or Williams, I would have posted the same thing. You’re the one with the agenda - not me. You’re so sensitive, like teenage girl in love with one guy...

Bltch, you said I had an agenda and you’re too much of a punk to back it up because you know you’re wrong. Admit you’re wrong, or be continue to be a dumb shlt.

What? So, you got nothing.

You have really shltty comprehension or have an agenda of your own. I have no agenda, it’s pretty fūcking clear. Just look at my posting history regarding the QBs. Before you post that somebody has an agenda, you better make fūcking sure you know it’s true.

No it isn’t. Somebody says something stupid, so we answer back with similar stupidity? That’s how these threads go off the rails.

A few people when they remember that play, think he scored. That’s the one thing I remember clearly is that he did not score, and I thought he was going to. It was Lou’s as fūck as he was running down the sideline. I wish somebody would post that play

From an overall perspective that’s correct. I was just diagnosing the one single play. There are always going to be a few plays where it’s better to dump off. Even if it’s just one or two or just a handful of plays each game. You need to be able to go down field to keep the defense honest and...

To me, this should not be a Tate versus Perry, or any quarterback versus any quarterback, discussion. It was an honest look at a play, and the dissection of the quarterback reads. That’s all. It could’ve been any quarterback, but I saw this tweet and it jumped out at me that the guy that wrote...

EAD... i’ve seen literally thousands of exciting canes plays. I remembered the play but was off by a year. That was straight off the top of my head. No reasonable person that reads this would disagree with what I’m saying. You’re just being your usual gayturd cūnt. Go back to sucking off Tebow...

You’re quick. That’s it. What a play! And the original point being that Dorsey had a lot of these with his weapons. Not to say that he didn’t go down the field, he did, but he almost always made the right decision

It’s limited interaction, I don’t know the exact rules, but I would bet my entire mortgage that the quarterbacks are reviewing every single play with Enos. Every. Single. Play.

Thanks I was going strictly off memory in my head. That was one **** of an exciting play