Search results

Except he was not even named the starter for game 1. Saying you are expected to be the starter, and officially declaring it, are two different things. Read his statement. He leaves the door open. Now, I think Rosier will end up being the starter, I just don’t think the guys behind him are...

Because that statement wasn’t an official declaration of the starter. But you know, Rudy needs his clicks.

Richt’s statement that day was ambiguous. My interpretation of his statement was he left the door open, but just didn’t emphasize it. In other words, the old “if the game was being played tomorrow, Rosier would be the starter.” It’s a way to show confidence in his presumed starting...

I think he’s using Richt’s statement at ACC days and extrapolating to generate buzz and clicks. Unless I see it from another source, an actual quote, I’m not believing it.