Search results

That sounds a lot like pay for play.

Check your math. He wasn’t here for 6-7 years. He’s was here 5. Both Kosar and Testaverde came in 82 and both redshirted. Kosar started 83 and 84. Testiverde started 85 and 86.

The problem is a collective is an organization whose sole purpose is to provide a mechanism for boosters to channel money to recruits. They are not an on-going business concern with a profit motive to provide earnings for shareholders or owners. Who are they providing their name, image or...

... and acquiring talent in the first place reverts back to the "ol' bag game". (do not like :mad:)

Yes, it would be a marketing or sale promotion expense. Payroll or salaries are for employees.

Probably not unless it was leaked. Compensation to executive officers are disclosed in 10K and 10Q filings with the SEC. But other personal compensation of any type is confidential. It will most likely get charged to a marketing or sale promotion account in their general ledger along with...

:pgdead: What those dumb *** gators started with that pic of sloppy mac n cheese. :ibis-roflmao-sm3:

Go through the lists. You'll find more one offs that had great defenses. But you'll also find those that had sustainable success has both great QBs and great defenses. Just look at Oklahoma. They've been to the playoffs more times than us but over the last 20 years, they have the same number...

This is about the fairest take I've heard so far. This kid's got skills but I don't know how they will translate when you move up a weight class. It can happen but the risk is higher. It's best if he's not the lone QB in this class. And I'm not saying that because he should be thought of as...

... and I would think it's also enforceable if the employee transfers to another school as long as the employee continues to fulfill his obligations. If you tie the contract to a particular institution, it could be interpreted a pay-for-play. If so, that could open a whole can of worms. I'll...

Think of it from a marketing perspective rather than a recruiting perspective. Mannings NIL value is based on the name recognition from the success of his uncles. It already exists. From a recruiting perspective it's more a projection of future value. It will increase if they hit the field...

... particularly if we show up as an ill prepared, mistake prone team as we've commonly done in the past. That skews the percentage towards the less talented fundamentally sound team further.

That's where you're wrong. No one is settling. We're going with the flow trying to remain focused on our priorities. You talk as if we're in the same position as Bama or Georgia. They can afford to focus on one position if they want. They're stacked everywhere. We have critical holes that...

It's about both. Don't forget what JJ did between 84 and 85 after Olivadotti left. And it was essentially with the same dudes.

Then keep them sweating. Distract them from filling the rest of their needs. One recruit does not make a class. Meanwhile we have to do what we have to do.

It seems some have jumped to that conclusion.

… and a couple of OTs. What happens after Nelson leaves?

Yepit's definitely coming across as desperation. For us, you win some, lose some, move on to the next. In our situation. it's not like the cupboard is bare, there are more critical priorities.

I get that. We’ll need to see how this NIL plays out. If the two Leeds says become available, they’re going to attract a lot of attention ($$$). And they’ll most likely be in the minority

While there are serviceable QBs from the portal, they will most likely be the dreaded “game manager” type. Gottis doesn’t have the cachet that a Lincoln Riley has.