Search results

I know we have had these stupid leaks in the past, but I don't believe this is a UM leak situation, my friend. If we're being real, portal business requires having people talking and setting up a line of communication between the school and the player. Any kid with options is going to want to...

I wholeheartedly agree there is no evidence of a violation, and I never said anything to the contrary. But your statement that the "only thing that you can assume from this article is that SOMEBODY wants him to come him" is just wrong. Jacksoff wrote: "As for cornerback, a source in touch with...

Coaches should be as tight-lipped as possible, absolutely. But it does not appear this information got to Jacksoff from a UM staffer (but a person "in touch with" UM). Let's be very real for a minute. If you want to slay the portal, discussions between players' intermediaries and staffers...

I didn't say you were a simp or a troll... read it again. But you were very clearly attempting to: 1) make a meaningless comparison between internal discussions concerning a coach on the team with potential external discussions involving a player on another team, and 2) your "could be anyone"...

The article essentially said a source in touch with UM said we would love to have him. The necessary implication being the information ultimately came from UM. On the one hand, sure, simply "lov[ing] to snag" a kid who is on another team isn't a violation. And most college teams would "love...

1. UM can do whatever it wants regarding firing its corches and it isn't a recruiting violation. Your comparison is apples to oranges. 2. Jacksoff said a "source in touch with UM" told him UM "would love to snag . . . Stevenson." So while this news came to Jacksoff from a non-UM employee...

Officially an ***** of the program.