Search results

  1. No_Fly_Zone

    Back to the talent topic

    These things are not mutually exclusive. Edit: Also, recruiting is not a 1-step process. Casting a wider net to scour the nation for productive players with good measurables is easier than ever. Technology, influx of capital, third-party vendors, camps, etc... make pooling this information...
  2. No_Fly_Zone

    Back to the talent topic

    Is he going to camps? Selected for major all-star games? Offers from all top 10 schools? Which school is he leaning towards? How many subscribers do they have? Lots of politics. He'd at least be a 3*. Probably a 4*. Outside chance at 5*, but unlikely. But overall, yes, recruiting services are...
  3. No_Fly_Zone

    Back to the talent topic

    No, but only because the moment a recruit commits to a decent p5 school he gets a 3rd star.
  4. No_Fly_Zone

    Back to the talent topic

    I think you are equating my use of "information" to mean exclusively "measurables." All measurables are certainly information, but not all information is measurables. I agree with you that our coaches should be evaluating for traits beyond pure athletic testing numbers. I happen to think...
  5. No_Fly_Zone

    Back to the talent topic

    This can't be understated. Information asymmetry has been minimized quite a bit. Programs with multi-million dollar recruiting budgets hire teams of analysts and staff to review film and find recruits all over the country (and especially in South Florida). High school players and coaches put...
Back
Top