Search results

  1. MyKidIsLoggedIn2MyAccount

    Highly Rated HS QBs attrition (according to The Athletic article)

    I agree. And to him is it Top 50 overall prospects who are qbs? Or top 50 ranked qbs? In the first case maybe Ohio State and Bama only, at best? And then the obvious answer is: well of course if you could land a top 50 prospect overall who is a qb every year, and not have too many retention...
  2. MyKidIsLoggedIn2MyAccount

    Highly Rated HS QBs attrition (according to The Athletic article)

    Unless it’s an Uber obvious guy like Bryce Young then yeah. If you can’t get one of those super elite guys then load up on low 4-star/high 3-star types each year, and attack the portal. While not the same logic, It reminds me on the one and done in college basketball. It may be more optimal...
  3. MyKidIsLoggedIn2MyAccount

    Highly Rated HS QBs attrition (according to The Athletic article)

    While it’s always optimal to get the best qb possible in each high school class, at this point, it almost seems like the more worse case scenario, or to just load up with 1-2 solid hs qbs every year and then simultaneously attack the portal, could almost be just as productive.
Back
Top