Search results

Actually I did have context about that team discussing the talent, what they had coming back, what happened in year 3 up until that point which you got wrong, breaking strength and speed records as well. Should I add that they basically lost their four best players for the entire season, too...

No idiot here. Again he inherited a Miami team with heavy sanctions and major scholarship reductions still winning 9 games multiple times before all the young studs and a full roster finally was maturing in his last year here: see 11 wins. That’s called context. He held this program together...

This response makes no sense in the context of UNC and my post.Youre not able to respond in details about that team, how the program was building at that time, and the context of what they were becoming pre-scandal. Nor are you smart enough to understand how good of a season they actually had...

Ladoucer didn’t lose for like 12 years there. He had a lot of eventual nfl guys there. I’m sure recruiting like **** happened during his time there across California and once better known across the country. It just wasn’t as directly obvious with all the media attention you get nowadays with IMG.

No L when the poster is too stupid to understand the original post and gets worse each time. bye creep

Now it’s just creepy. Go away.

No. Please see post on context and details of that team and program at that given time. Without that understanding then responding to me is basically pointless. It’s a waste of time.

No gargling necessary. You’re just making it worse and confirming what I said. Thanks.

Context matters as does actually being able to remember details. Given you didn’t understand either then it’s pointless to try and keep going.

this post and prior ones on UNC are 100% fact: UNC was about to become a perennial top 10 program. Even that last scandal year with all the suspensions they still had a great year and even almost beat LSU with like double digit starters or two deep guys gone. I remember watching the dline with...