Search results

  1. Miami[]_[]Smoke

    Targeting vs not targeting

    Because It was on a defenseless plAyer that got injured and they had time to review it
  2. Miami[]_[]Smoke

    Targeting vs not targeting

    Goodness people, read the rule. Also has previous examples of exactly what’s smith did Saturday https://www.bannersociety.com/2017/9/2/20732365/targeting-penalty-rulebook-college-football
  3. Miami[]_[]Smoke

    Targeting vs not targeting

    You’re correct but it’s 100 times more likely to be called and seen on a defenseless player. Like I said before, the Lawrence wasn’t even caught or called on the field. The only reasons it was later called later are because Lawrence was injured and the booth had time to see the replay and tell...
  4. Miami[]_[]Smoke

    Targeting vs not targeting

    Do you know the difference between a defenseless player and runner yet? Pretty sure king was running there
  5. Miami[]_[]Smoke

    Targeting vs not targeting

    So you want refs to determine Intent now? Yeah that will take away the subjectivity...😕
Back
Top