Search results

Isn't this the same method of selecting every single NCAA sanctioned postseason tournament? It's always been that way for all sports. I don't think it's "becoming" more so than just continuing.

I haven't given my opinion on it one way or the other. The only argument I've made is that the quality of teams on the bubble vary from year to year and that a single criteria used to included/exclude a team one year might not be the same criteria used to include/exclude a team the following...

The field is not selected in a vacuum. It is affected by the other candidates available in any given year. If you break up with your girlfriend who is 250 because a different girl who weighs 150 is willing to date you, then that is totally reasonable. With the baseball tournament, some years...

Different seasons with different candidates for the last spots. It was a pretty weak bubble this year. Had UF posted this resume in 2018, they would have likely been left out. If UK had posted that resume in 2019, they would have likely been in.

Bubble teams can be stronger or weaker from year to year. I don't think a linear correlation can be made across seasons. Possibly Florida getting in is personal to you because they are a rival? You haven't mentioned TCU who has lower metrics across the board yet still got in. I've read no...

I didn't say anything. I left a group of statistics (the same ones the committee uses to determine the field) for people to draw their own conclusions. FYI, P5 is a football term. There is no P5 designation for baseball.

Team RPI Record SOS Q1 Record Q2 Record Q3 Record Q4 Record Florida 27 33-24 3 14-19 7-2 5-3 7-0 BYU 46 36-17 132 0-2 12-10 8-2 16-3 Texas State 52 36-20 92 4-4 8-5 14-8 10-3 Quadrant 1 (Q1): All Opponents (1-50) Quadrant 2 (Q2): All Opponents (51-100) Quadrant 3 (Q3): All...

For argument's sake, which team(s) do you think should have received an at-large bid above Florida?

There are certainly worse places to watch a game....