Search results

And yet still **** it up. Why are we wrong for discussing where we think teams **** it up? Mayock is upset that people analyze his ****** decisions the way he used to analyze others' decisions or something? I don't get it.

This is what I saw from watching him. Some wild cot**** throws weaved into some lasers. I value "processing" and "release" above basically all other traits in a QB. From the video available, he has a lot of work to do in those areas, but lucky for him he doesn't have to play for like 2-3 years.

Thought the Gladney and Lamb picks were really good for each team. I still find Becton to be a **** of a risk inside the Top 15. Wirfs was a straight steal, and wanted the Phins to aggressively make a move for him. Agree on Arnette, as I've mentioned earlier. Talk to me about some dudes you're...

Yep. That's what I'm talking about in the bolded. The Ravens have shown some great examples. They look for really talented players, but then ensure they have certain intangible traits.

I agree with all of this. Especially how well San Fran has done. Minnesota has also done a very nice job.

He's going against his own stated belief system on reaching hard for need. I know you and him love this intangible/theme stuff, but I think it's overdone. It's the stuff used for rationalizations. I don't mind it as a common denominator thing used for good picks (like we draft value first, good...

Not a fan of the Arnette pick. There were at least 5 corners I preferred over him. It goes against so much of the **** Mayock would say when he was an analyst. He's hit on some good players, but dude seems to panic in drafts.