Search results

How is the "schedule" portion decided? What are the components to make up the number? How close is it to "how X and Y team both did against Z team?"

I would be lying if i said i knew how S&P+ comes up with their peer data.

I'm not talking about his conclusion as it relates to Enos' time at CMU. I'm talking about the methodology of using peer to peer vs totality stats. The problem for Enos is that, even peer to peer, his time at CMU is a question mark in my eyes. But, I'm encouraging people to start viewing...

I'll say this on each one of your posts (another great one, BTW), who disagrees with this and why? Can we get a rationale from those people? Context is everything with statistics. And, it doesn't beat watching every single game and understanding "why" things unfolded the way did, but if we can...