Search results

Which is irrelevant since we don’t attempt to give more female athletic scholarships than male athletic scholarships.

That’s only one of three possible requirements. We don’t choose to meet that standard. We more fall in line with #2.

That's a common misunderstanding. Most schools don't have equal participation among men and women. Football, with 85 scholarships, ends that discussion before it even gets started. To be Title IX compliant, you have to do one of these three things: 1. Provide participation opportunities for...

We aren’t adding “Men’s” anything. We would only add Women’s sports, or nothing at all.

Right, because the footprint for each of those structures is about the same size.

I’m saying that if it depended on being a money maker, we would just drop everything except football, basketball and the women’s sports needed for Title IX. If anything, adding another women’s sport would help the Title IX balance. There’s likely just little interest.

It has nothing to do with being a money maker. Almost every sport at every college loses money already.