Search results

Middle schoolers have funnier stuff than that.

And there's still Butch love and Richt hate to jag on. What makes you any different.

No, I actually want us to win. You're pulling for Boston College. I just love that you hate Richt.

Don't flatter yourself. I don't think twice about you. But I love that you Neanderthals hate him.

Richt isn't going to coach for the next 100 years. There will be a next guy. And you will complain when we don't go 14-0.

Yes, I absolutely love that you hate our coach.

Because you're going to say the same thing about the next guy who comes in and loses three games every year.

Because you hate him and I love to see you ****ed off.

You said he was exposed against LSU, so obviously you thought highly of him before LSU.

So common opponent comparisons are only valid when talking about Miami?

So you thought Richt was equal to Saban until the LSU game. That explains a lot.

Oh, that was his first loss?

But common opponents are legitimate yardsticks, right? Both of them played Purdue, therefore we can use those results to compare EMU and OSU.

Can I get a translation on that? Hint: if you're going to question someone else's intelligence, don't ***** up an eight-word sentence.

The first yardstick is meaningless for comparison, unless you're admitting that Eastern Michigan is better than Ohio State. Can't have it both ways.

Your poor writing is due to you just being a person of mediocre intelligence, as you already confirmed. There is nothing cultural about it.

Yeah, you're looking at one common opponent. I'll ask again, but I know you're terrified: do I need to give you a list of common-opponent scores that mean absolutely nothing?

You do realize that the term Ebonics does not have a negative connotation and was coined by black scholars to represent African American styles of speech.

Just an observation.

But it was your only point about four pages ago. Mullen > Richt because of LSU. That was your point.