Search results

He listed Florida, Tennessee, and Miami. Which one of those made the Sweet 16? Looks like he won that round.

That's my point. Loyola-Chicago has recruits and is in the Sweet 16 and they were somehow able to do that without being UNC or Duke. You've heard, right? We should he happy making the tournament because we will never be UNC or Duke.

It's also meaningless 2.5 days into the tournament.

We're not even through day 3 yet. How are you already crowning a conference.

I'll bet all of the recent recruits were swayed by that run in 1963.

So it's possible to be a very good team without having the history of Duke and UNC?

If they don't suck, then you think they're good. But how can they be good, like Sweet 16 good, with their history? They aren't UNC or Duke and they never will be. How were they able to get good players and then coach them up to knock off legit programs like Florida and Tennessee?

Coach Mullenaga lovers can't wait 30 seconds to run to the message board to defend him after a game he didn't coach in.