Search results

True, but that team choked in the first round (thanks Lonnie), so he's never actually won an NCAA tourney game.

Certainly seems that way I would add, before Covid the NCAA had the 5 to play 4 rule, meaning you were only eligible for 5 years once you enrolled (subject to exceptions), and you could only actually play for 4 years. I don't know if that rule is still intact, but Moore has already completed...

This could potentially be problematic

Lykes is more skilled, but in terms of value to this team, I think I'll take Moore. Much more of a true point guard, which is something we haven't had since Angel graduated. Lykes on the other had is basically short Lou Williams, which doesn't really fit our needs and honestly never has.

Only if you assume Lykes is actually 5'7"

Like I said in the Miller thread, team's gonna be just good enough next year for Blake to once again talk himself into not doing anything.

DePaul just had a coaching change as well

Who would you rather have, Charlie Moore or Chris Lykes?

At 1:23 he did the Durand Scott quick-shot layup. Love that move, messes up the shot blocker's timing so bad.

You can definitely see some Lykes-esque hero ball chucker in those highlights too.

This is exactly what a Jim Larranaga point guard should look like. 3 level scorer that can get into the lane, draw double teams, and find the open man.

Keep? This is like his 7th year of college basketball, he'll be here for exactly 8 months.