Search results

Wrong. UM has those years slotted for other opponents. If the contract stated "shall be rescheduled at the next mutual open date for both teams" you would be correct. The language clearly doesn't require to UM to schedule merely at their next scheduled opening. Keep swinging slugger.

One of these times you are actually going to read the contract. The rescheduling will occur "as such exigencies may permit or dictate." UM is under no obligation to schedule it in a manner that is inconvenient for them.

"...as such exigencies may permit or dictate." That language clearly does not obligate UM to schedule a game merely the next time there is any opening on the schedule.

In a sport where games are scheduled 12 years in advance, UM asking for an additional 3 years hardly seems unreasonable. Also, pursuant to the contract, the rescheduling need not occur simply when it is possible for Miami to play the game, the rescheduling will occur "as such exigencies may...