Search results

Roger. And hey, you were right! And I'm **** glad you were ;-)

@duke4heisman @Boots I hear you, and am happy to agree to disagree. If you think Tate requested a waiver for any reason other than the fact he wasn't going to play in front of fields, then you are fooling yourself.

So an assistant coach committing DV against his wife in their own home years ago is grounds for a QB from that team getting to transfer without sitting because he is close with his sister and mother? That makes absolutely no sense. The coaching changes is a different issue; the DV situation...

I agree with this. While I think the Fields racial thing was complete BS in terms of that necessitating him needing a waiver, at least that was an incident directed at him. How does the fact one of the OSU coaches had DV issues with his wife off campus, have any impact on Martell whatsoever...

My point was the fact you aren't going win playing time is not supposed to be a reason for a waiver to be granted. If Fields truly did not use the racial issue as part of his request (which, again, I don't believe for a second) then I can't see ANY basis why he would be entitled to one under...

No doubt. His whole waiver case was a sham. .... then again, so is Tate's. 🤫

I've heard that... and I don't buy it for a second.