Search results

What scares me more is the premium on RT for us with Tua being a lefty. Take Jenkins at 36 and it is much less concerning.

So they traded 50 and a 3rd in 22 to take Eichenberg at 42. But was the safety really going before 50? Why not take Jenkins or Eichenberg at 36 and keep the 3rd?

That’s fine but was it really a need or a luxury because we have two big *** holes on our OL that NEED to get filled and had some great players sitting there at those positions.

Grier sucks.

I thought the same but then Grier said last night they turned down trade offers for 6. He could be full of **** and it could be what was offered was either not enough or not in the right part of the first round, but if taking him at face value then Waddle was a target of theirs at 6. Which is...

These ****** are going to trade down from three and then trade back up twice to go to four? I can’t believe this to have weight to it.

I don't like the value there. You could have likely gotten him at 9 and not had to give up that extra pick. Alternatively, you could likely trade back and still get him. If the board shakes out 3 qbs, Pitts, Chase in some order, then you go Sewell or trade back if there is a partner.

If it is Waddle at 6 then Grier needs to be fired before pick 18. That would be an absolute joke of mismanagement.

I agree entirely. That Igbinoghene pick was the one that was a big question last year. It is incredible that we have any holes on the OL given the number of draft picks and big FA signings we have invested in it, though Hunt and Kindley look promising. But the number of big FA signings he...

I think Grier is great at accumulating picks and trades. I think his free agency choices leave a LOT to be desired and his drafting of players is questionable too. It still is too early to say definitively on his drafting as it all really boils down to Tua.