Search results

I agree that we need explosiveness. I am just saying its easier to find an impact WR at 18 than an impact OT that is a once a decade prospect. We do need explosiveness but Tua also needs time to throw. The bigger issues on both of those lists are the **** evaluations and high number of busts...

If your first two picks are OL and WR in some combination, wouldn't it make more sense to go Sewell at 6 if he is there and then best WR at 18? Sewell is coming out as one of those once in a decade OL.

Big if, but if Mac goes 3 and Pitts 4, do the Phins wind up trading back again? Two of the top QBs would be left in that case.

And pay him less per year.

So it was 3 and 123 for 6, 102, 156, and SF’s 2023 first. Grier is amazing at building draft capital. Hopefully he uses the picks well.