Search results

  1. F

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    Everyone saw with their "eyes" something was different, but you nailed it with your analysis. People may hate Manny's blitzes or whatever, but when he was here the games he called worked except for the 1 glaring example. What Baker did was more DNO than Manny
  2. F

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    Whoa whoa whoa big guy. I'm just pointing out a couple of things I find interesting about our lil community here. But because it's you, i'll discuss. My eyes tell me we were a good D when Manny was a DC and the stats say the same thing. The whole any team with a pulse demolishes us thing...
  3. F

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    I missed that response. That's a good one and one that I would believe to be spot on
  4. F

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    Yes, to me it's very interesting. Maybe sad is the word i'm really looking for here?
  5. F

    Upon Further Review: Manny Diaz as DC

    This thread is fascinating to say the least. When @Lance Roffers is critical of the D or anything else about our program the same poeple who are in here trying to pick holes in his analysis are stepping over each other to praise Lance for keeping it real or whatever dumbass **** they want to...
Back
Top