Search results

You sound like everything that has been wrong with this program for 20 years. Discussing recuiting isn’t moping or complaining. No idea how you can conclude otherwise. As for ‘21, you’re free to conclude what you want, read what you want. Discuss with whoever you want. But you’ve flailed...

You've already said you have no idea which ones to get, and you'll be happy with any 3 from some list someone else created. Most people here aren't crying or complaining. If it looks that way to you, you may not understand what goes on on this board. Most people here are interested in...

Why do you appear to be bothered by other people discussing these things? You can be a fan your way. Doesn't mean others shouldn't. There are plenty of people on this and other boards who have unique knowledge and/or track records of being right on recruiting topics over time.

Exactly what I've been saying.

Don't we all.

You may have some cognitive challenges to work through. You said what you said, and I did just what you say the board is support to be about. I disagreed with you! Specifically, I said that the 'any three of them will be good' mentality was wrong, and part of the lazy recruiting mentality...

We don’t agree on what the program needs. If you’d be happy with any three players on a hype list created by others, then you’re too easily pleased and no doubt befuddled by our dosastrous past 18 years. And if you think you don’t need to be a scout to say that any 3 guys on that would be a...

You sound bad at reading comprehension or personalize responses on this board too much. My comments were clear and stand for themselves. If you think just getting a few decently rated kids is good enough for this program, we can just disagree.

I haven’t complained at all. You chose to jump on a comment I made and tried to tell me not to care who we sign. I responded, telling you I thought your arguments made no sense to me. You are free to think whatever you want about our recruiting, and I and others are free to ask questions as...

We can just disagree. You’re basically using a lot of words to say you don’t know and because you don’t know, if someone else tells you something comforting (rankings or whatever), then you’ll be happy until it all fails. Do whatever makes you happy. But if you don’t understand why others...

Your logic makes no sense. I’m not looking for happiness advice. The question is whether we’re getting the right kids. Just because I as a casual don’t yet know who they are doesn’t mean it doesn’t matter who they are or it’s not knowable. That’s why we have coaches who do work.

Nah, im not. The comment that we just need a few good kids has been around since we’ve stunk. We need more than that, and in this era if we have to beat SEC schools for kids, so be it.

i’m not the person to answer that. sometimes i have a view, usually after immersing in recruiting for a while. we’re a year out from nsd and i haven’t been close to next years kids. some folks on this site have first hand knowledge and you ask them. but the point is, that’s what evals are...

this mindset i can’t agree with. started back under coker. there are at most 3-4 DE prospects in all of so fla who will be high nfl picks in a few years. probably fewer. we don’t need 3-4 good ones, whatever that means. we need the right 3-4. properly evaluated. kids who will go on to...