Search results

The opening post was a ridiculous suggestion that the discussion has clearly moved on from. Did you have another point? You're going to restrict what, exactly?

It's a great gif because you're the muttonheaded fantasy land profession with the bow-tie. That you think you're Rodney in that clip is precious. You don't even have an argument to articulate. Cost controls don't on their own create competition - there's no reason to think they would...

I don't mention the NHL because I don't give a **** about hockey. Sorry. Your NBA response is ridiculous. I mean, truly ridiculous. Wasn't your argument about 'parity'? We don't have more parity, we just have different teams dominating. The reason is because in the NBA, a couple great...

Ask any cfo in the world if he'd like someone to control his costs, and he'd say yes. Does not mean it's legal, doesn't mean it's smart, doesn't mean it would do anything positive, certainly doesn't mean it would help his company compete. Once you realize his competitors will get the same...

You can't admit when you're wrong. It's funny. You're counting a 10 year period and pointing to the teams that were mostly up over that period. Clemson didn't do **** before 2015. Oklahoma hasn't done a lot at all, either way. Ohio State is a top program and has the run of a ****...

You are really dense. And quoting TR on a subject you're a boiled ham on is really rich. Professional sports leagues aren't in the maximize competition business, they're in the maximize value business. The NFL has some form of parity because careers are very short, contracts aren't...

LMAO at a folks thinking the right solution to anything is to tell a bunch of kinds where they're allowed to go to school. What's the purpose again? Bunch of FANS who have confused their emotions with what's good for other people's lives. When UM was winning regularly I don't think Miami...

QP prolly thinks it's moron, not moran. Doesn't even know what a pre madonna is.

No offense but you sound ridiculous. Universities are non-profit institutions (not generally attuned to economics) and athletic directors are a long way from CEOs and CEOs themselves tend to love regulators. None of which means isht about whether regulation actually accomplishes much, let...

if you think athletic directors are economically literate, generally highly intelligent or unbiased on this topic, you’re probably waiting in line to buy a bridge from the bathroom guy at a night club. your whole porst is idiotic. Of course ADs want someone to ‘help them’ control costs. As...

It would fail, like everything else. Right now there are 130 D1 teams and 85 scholarships per. That’s a bit over 11,000 D1 football scholarships. Your idea is to reduce it overall by >2000 spots? That isn’t in the interest of kids, amd won’t actually do what you want. It would backfire...

Yep. Our reality. Compounded when we’re on probation.

We'd have mass forfeits everywhere. Arkansas would be undefeated.

You're just wrong. This has nothing to do with controlling costs. Do you just say that or did you think about it? Your stated goal is to support competition. Salary caps control costs but actually entrench the positions of highest revenue teams - they just improve the economics of the...

you think only alabama, ohio state and clemson get away with bags?

Price controls work nowhere. If that’s your view, prepare your ****.

It’s funny that despite all evidence everywhere to the contrary, people still instinctively think more regulation will somehow benefit the little guys. If only we had the right regulators. Maybe Hillary Clinton could run the NCAA. I’m sure that would work out for the little teams. Wall St...

This too would backfire. People always focus on regulating one half of an equation and forget about the implications on other variables.

So the ncaa will prohibit a prospect student from plsying a sort at his chosen university because ... why?