Search results

Man, that's a lot of words. I think you're mostly wrong about most of it. It's been over-discussed around here so I don't really want to go over it all again. Just yesterday I posted a list of 'high recruits' we've totally blown the evals on going back to Coker. We've been objectively bad at...

it’s a good point and a real downside of guys going early who aren’t ready.

not sure how you’re defending our results. they’ve objectively sucked. we’ve done awfully with high recruits for almost 18 years. doesn’t mean the expectation is no mistakes - that’s unrealistic. but our results have been worse that others, which is one reason we’ve sucked.