Search results

Putting aside that I disagree - we’d have lost much worse than that - you’re saying a 1 loss UM that loses in ACCCG grts in over 1 loss Alabama without a recent loss because didn’t play in SECCG. IMO that wasn’t going to happen.

You think we’d have beaten clemson? or just played them close enough?

In truth, the players he inherited were maturing. And the prior staph stunk. A 1 win progression was weak.

Also recruiting, staff, culture and S&C

Except Richt would haver have hired Lashlee, and quit so he didn’t have to make changes. And King wouldn’t have gone to play for his train wreck of an offence.

Going from catastrophe to simply awful may be an improvement, but it sure ain’t much of am argument.

People consistently underestimste the talent Richt inherited. We were all sick of the Alfraud era, but it’s not true they left richt a bad roster. On D, he inherited RJ, Norton, C. Thomas, J. Jackson, Corn Elder, Rayshawn, Jaquan, Redwine, M. Jackson, Shaq, Pinkney, AQM, Grace, J. Carter, G...

I never understand these ‘ceo coach’ comments. What does that even mean? isn’t it the job of a ‘great ceo’ to pick his staff and hold them accountable? CEOs are supposed to set culture. Richt left this place close to poisonous. Ceos are supposed to recruit. Richt was lazy at recruiting...

Judging by Richt’s excessive loyalty and unwillingness to hold his own staff accountable or make changes, he’d have been an awful AD.

Yep. And most importantly, he himself knew it. Which is why he quit.