Search results

Great logic. Someone slow once was good, so this slow guy will be good.

We know the staph felt they needed more than 2 LBs because they tried to get more. So they failed. We’ll see whether Hyppolite is good enough or not. But if not him, then they could and should have identified and prioritized other options. Instead they cased two kids everyone knew weren’t...

This discussion has been going on because of our Lb whiff, because 75% of this board saw the greene and flowe whiffs coming for miles away and said so, because we had major lb needs in this class which haven’t been addressed, and because hyppolite is a local kid who athletically looks qualified...

Isn’t the better comparison Hyppolite vs the empty scholarship we have because the staph chased Greene and Flowe all fall?

I like his ball instincts, but not sure he’s big enough or quick enough, tbh. And not sure he projects to shed blocks well enough.