Search results

I pointed out the rules changed in ‘18. You asked what that meant. I explained. i pointed out that prior to ‘18, it was enrollees not LOIs that mattered. You now agree. i pointed to some kids who sgned LOIs pre ‘18 but didnt emroll. I made clear I didn’t know whether Witt counted...

You asked about a rule change in 2108 that I referenced. I responded. You listed signee numbers going back to 2011 as if they all necessarily equated to initial counters. Under the pre 2018 rule, they didn’t. You say we didn't have anyone sign who didnt enroll (or something to that effect)...

Prior to 2018, initial counters was measured differently. You could oversign, some kids didn’t get in, some grey shirted. So you saw big signing classes, but the LOIs didnt all translate to initial counters. Starting in ‘18, that got effectively shut down. Now LOIs count, so non qualifiers...

That is bs. The circumstances this cycle are not the same as the circumstances over past years. Richt did not max out initial counters and go backwards. And he allowed the roster to get well below it should have been. Rule changes since ’18 make it harder to refill today. also, the staff is...

I don’t understand your post. It is a fact that we have played with fewer than 85 recruited scholarship kids for years, and richt in particular did not max out his new counter options. None of that says what Manny has to work with, because the past is the past and Manny hammered the transfer...

Lol. And it was here written, recently, that that was not possible.