Search results

Could you imagine how good Clemson would be if they had the best QB in years at their helm, along with 5* guys on their DL?

As I have been yelling from the mountaintop since the Coker era: “It’s about the evaluations!”

You sure don’t seem to understand what I have written. I have been really clear. I don’t care about stars. Get the kids we need and quit failing and quit with excuses. If the kids we need are 4-5 star kids ... get them. If you can fill our roster with 3* kids who turn out to be studs who...

If your goal is just to be competitive with Syracuse and Iowa, then yes, better coaching will get us there. If your goal is to actually compete for CHAMPIONSHIPS, then nope, we cannot get there without elite talent.

You miss the point. It’s BOTH. Yes, bad coaching will ruin a program. But it requoes top talent to compete for national championships. Period. So we need both good coaching, and top talent, if we aspire to returning to winning titles.

I’m confused. Is someone here saying we should be ‘simply chasing stars’? I sure havent. Not sure what youre trying to say. The staff should not chase stars. It should chase GREAT PLAYERS. But if they come with stars, no excuses. Get them. If our staff is good enough to find Miami...

It’s not that stars define players. It’s that recruiting services and other programs are good enough to pile onto the best kids, because the information superhighway makes it easier, and changes the game. Say what you want about stars in the ‘80s and ‘90s, but the point is, we got the RIGHT...

FALSE. Totally false.

Drops iPhone. [/spoiler][/spoiler]