Search results

You have 85 guys on the roster. You’re talkimbout two. See?

Do you really not understand what that means? Imagine you have two players: one guy sucks, one guy you’re not sure about. He may be average, he may be great. You cut the guy who sucks from the team. Now you have one player. It would be fair to say of him that just because he doesn’t suck...

Agreed. We should expect to see significant differences, however. Because the last s&c guy was clearly not good. If we didnt see significant differences, it would be evidence that feeley isn’t good, either. But just because we see significant differences doesn’t mean he’s great.

Why would you even ask that? Have I suggested otherwise? I haven’t defended the prior S&C. To the contrary, I pointed out that because the prior guy was so bad, you could be a lot better without actually being great. I am not saying Feeley isn’t or won’t be great, either. Just that the...

Joe Jackson? Chad Thomas? Walton, Njoku, AQM, Perryman?

come on man. We have had guys who transformed their bodies. Ot just wasnt consistent or widespread.

Feeley sounds good, imo, but we have to remember that a lot of what you are praising him for is just basic do your job stuff. Being better than an incompetent guy doesn’t make you a hero. We should _expect_ this sort of S&C program.