Search results

Child (I'm being far too kind) stop squirming and answer the question. Maybe nap time? You get so cranky when you struggle.

The point of my question was to highlight how limited you are in comprehension. Accomplished of course as you completely missed the central question (ok, well almost all of them) Now, back to the actual question (not the one you made up). Go back and read what I asked muppet. Hysterical you...

Do you think UVA is an environment for D1P5 football program success less than, equal to, or greater than the University of Miami? Same question for Duke, Wake Forest, and Vanderbilt. Now, same question for FSU, Auburn, UNC-CH? Starting from today, does Nick Saban win a natty in a shorter...

And this is just, perhaps*, a bad/weird take from you on not being able to recognize leadership ability and ability to install the right organizational structures to support success. Please take pity and regale of tales of all the bad/weird takes. I'll make you famous. *I'm was being...

👆 Go ahead and skin it. OR... Join us in the debate about pro/con of Manuela's D. Choice is yours "dude".

Ok. Sure. I'll make you famous. But please, continue by derailing what was being discussed, dude... or it is bruh? 🙄 I think you need to loosen up the skinny jeans.

Ok Champ. There is an ignore feature, learn to use it like other muppets or bring facts to a healthy debate. Sun rises and sets regardless. What is in the water with folks like you these past 24 hours?

Paired with what type of O? Complicated question. I would say his scheme and play calling ability probably puts him overall top 30. Is that good enough to be a ACCCD cotender year in and year out? 😬 Personally, I believe Broncy Bronc is an upgrade over Manuela as HC and/or DC. With that...

You are missing two zeros behind the "2". Tomato, to-mah-toe. We could add: - LSU (Peach) - UVA (OB) - BYU (Provo) - K St (HRS) - Penn St (Fiesta) etc... etc... etc... My point is Manuela has been consistently tied to multiple program's "oh god oh god we suck" losses.

I agree, but also disagree. Manuela's D scheme simply isn't structured (very difficult in today's rule sets anyways) to hold any opponent to under 17-21 points unless the Canes O can sustain drives. That is a critical component to making Manuela's D go--pin ears back and force opponent into...

With that said, the O let the Canes down in several games. While certainly an improvement, the amount of 3-out and 15-20ish stalled drives is not ACCCD winning football, let alone beyond.

Manuela's D philosophy, at every single one of his stops, has been based on "havoc" behind LoS and points of engagement by his LBs. He is, without a doubt, an upgrade over D'No, but anyone on this board as DC (YES EVERBODY) would fit that role. This strategy isn't a bad one, but it does have...