Search results

Actually much smaller than you are implying--but certainly not zero (as it should be when ANY POTUS over steps the law*) SCOTUS waiving vigorously at you. *The law IS NOT what you or I wish we want it to be, but what it ACTUALLY IS. One of my faves is border wall funds spiked on any douche...

Don't disagree with you one bit--terrible look qualified or unqualified. Sadly, this very behavior has been done since G Washington took his first Oath of Office.

Ah yes....Vanessa O and her "To the Source" project. Of course, with no peer reviewed data sets or methodologies and "analysts" populated from journalism schools far and wide. CNN crowd screams, "see! Fox is biased (ignoring their oen placement) and the Fox crowd screams back, "man the...

Uncles, Aunts, Brothers, Sisters, In-laws, Spouses and other inner circle sychophants are ok? Just want to establish the edges here of what is deemed acceptable. PS They are ALL terrible, terrible looks. JQ Adams is waiving vigorously just for starters by the way. That didn't take long did it.

I don't even know where to start with this, however, how many examples of former POTUS administrations would you like me to cite that have done exactly what you describe above x10? Its a long, long list so get comfy. Again, learn civics and then come back and lets debate if the actual...

Um...learn civics. Your argument might go better with a deeper understanding of how our laws are written and enforced. [as i rattle the cage of the "lawyers" on here]

Also pretty accurate ☝️☝️. Am I on CIS?? I think I'm lost.

Actually pretty accurate.☝️ Refreshing and so rare round here.

I believe his participation in NCAA athletics waives the requirement.