Search results

Avoids topics. States vague items. Every conversation you on this board. EVERYONE but Jagr wins. There. Fixed it.

Um. Is English your second or third language? GED much? Perhaps reread and redigest the full context of what I'm stating.

You really make this too easy.

1v8 correct. I'm not supportive. Bet your last dollar that's happening over next 3-6 years. 1v10. Correct on single elimination. Perhaps "play-in week" by reducing field #7v#10 and #8v#9. #1-#6 have first week bye. Final 8 matchups begin. 1v16. Perhaps. Perhaps not at some point in future.

Like yourself? That might be funniest thing you have ever said in your life. Good for you!

P.S. ESPN better worry about cord cutters, not Alabama-Citadel ratings.

How embarrassed will you feel when they expand the CFP and put a #1v#8/#10/#16 matchup on the field? Then again, you have it all figured out and the actual decision makers don't. Why aren't you a decision maker then with your obvious talent? How lucky for this board to have a key CFP insider...

Last I checked, market attended Citadel's beat down by Alabama. And the revolution was televised (with actual Neilsen viewers oh my!). What else you got?

It really doesn't get any easier to explain. I even used small words for your benefit! Worst possible strategy--says YOU. Better strategy says the market and the decision makers. How do you stand existing around the little people being so much smarter and well versed than the rest? Must be...

As a conference champion in D1FBS, yes. It's the principal of it. If NCAA doesn't want them in, further segregate D1P5 away from D1FBS entirely and be done with it. Last I checked, no one was screaming for Alabama to cancel it's annual Citadel slaughter. Or Miami's FAMU beating, or, or, or...

It isn't about #1 vs #100. D1 FBS should have a post season tournament that allows all the conference champs to settle it on the field. Unless of course you are deemed the arbiter as to who is worthy. Thankfully you, nor I, are. If you want to see your version of the CFP format, have at it...

Wow. Considering I've humiliated you in every single other thread where you've stated your usual drivel, I take your words as a compliment. When will you learn? Steep curve I suppose. Maybe even inverted.

Something you clearly struggle comprehending. Let me simplify for you. D1 FBS, like it or not, is comprised of 10 conferences. That's fact. No, I'm not counting the abomination that is the loosely categorized "independents conference". Each of said 10 conferences produces a champion...

You of course know definitively year after year, with zero dissension, as to who those chosen four teams are? Please enlighten us all as to the nature of your divinity. My original point being, of course, I believe four is too small, sixty-four outrageous, and twelve-thirteenish about right...

Thunderdome.

This. F[]ck Notre Dame and their special handling as an independent. No idea why the conferences tolerate the NCAA inclusion of Notre Dame "if ranked high enough". In my opinion, they shouldn't even be in top 4 this year. Not because they aren't good enough, but because they purposefully...

I don't disagree with your points. With that said, how did winner take all work out for baseball's ratings? While March Madness 64 is excessive wrt to football, tough to argue against at a minimum each FBS conference champ doesn't make the post season. Dismantle the bowls, let's get an...

Tell that to Super Bowl Champions who entered post season via wild card slots. Let it be settled on the field. Somewhere between 8-16 teams appears to be the right number. I lean towards 12-13 (all D1 conference champs and 1-2 at large picks)