Search results

  1. D

    Upon Further Review- Dan Enos

    Yeah, I can't get there on CMU being a good offensive team when he was there. I think it is a fantastic reach. The end goal of an offense is to score points and be efficient. Scoring/Efficiency 2010: 84th/80th 2011: 91st/74th 2012: 64th/71st 2013: 96th/103rd 2014: 81st/61st
  2. D

    Upon Further Review- Dan Enos

    I think looking at individual data points is good but you also need to look at the complete picture as well. His offenses overall, and record, at CMU were not good. FWIW, I think your breakdown was quite good. I just think using those words was not needed.
  3. D

    Upon Further Review- Dan Enos

    I can agree with that.
  4. D

    Upon Further Review- Dan Enos

    That is like saying, what did his time as OC at Arky or QB coach at Bama have to do with him here. As a HC, you run the program exactly as you want it. He was running the offense exactly how he wanted and it wasn't good, much worse then the prior coaching staff. I just find that comment...
  5. D

    Upon Further Review- Dan Enos

    A passing game savant and one of the best offensive minds in college football doesn't take over a program and have a bad offense for 5 straight years.
Back
Top