Search results

  1. Dan E. Dangerously

    RECRUITING CLASS RANKING: PORTAL+ SURGE 19-

    I don't want to derail roly's thread more than I already have, and it's not my intent to come across as a ****. My initial comments were mostly just a reaction to this ridiculous blog post on CanesWarning, which reads like a 911 truther analyzing the impact of jet fuel on steal beams...
  2. Dan E. Dangerously

    RECRUITING CLASS RANKING: PORTAL+ SURGE 19-

    I mean, props to @roly2324 for taking the time. All I'm saying is I don't get why lots of people feel the need to "fact check" our recruiting class ranking. The fact we got supplemental guys that will contribute is all I care about. I don't need to have ammo to correct the record against someone...
  3. Dan E. Dangerously

    RECRUITING CLASS RANKING: PORTAL+ SURGE 19-

    I don't see the need to try and reinvent our class ranking. It is what it is, and it's impossible to accurately re-rank college players with a new crop of high school kids.
Back
Top