Search results

  1. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    If you thought rival coaches were negative recruiting our coaches / scheme to receivers before the season just imagine now.
  2. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    Lol, i figured it was something like that.
  3. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    I was talking db’s since thats who they’re facing. Our three safeties and TS is a very good group.
  4. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

  5. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    Thanks for explaining, I‘m surprised it was necessary but oh well. There’s a handful of guys we can’t lose or it would be a major hit to the season. We can’t lose any of the top four dt’s but D Jackson would be awful. At least with the other guys we can slide messidor, Elijah or Lichtenstein...
  6. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    We can’t lose JHH , Taylor or Jackson but Jackson is the only one that can do what he does.
  7. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    You started your post with “Not all teams that finish in the top 10 or start out in the top 10 have a top 10 roster. Then ended it with “ we only play like 2 teams that actually do have an overall roster better than us”. I’m messing with you but it reminded me of this lol
  8. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    We don’t have a top ten roster. I think we have enough front line talent to be a top 10-15 team. We duct taped this thing up good enough to make a run to the Acccg. Once again it depends on injures.
  9. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    I’ve never said we have a three deep on the DL. I’ve said we have pass rushers and a bunch of hybrid types, good ones. I’ve also said multiple times my buggiest issues is there’s no stumps in the middle minus Jackson. He’s a space eater that disrupts. Lacking big bodies is a concern. Just...
  10. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    I’ve never said that lunacy . We don’t have many space eater like Jackson, he’s an absolute handful. I’ve said big bodies inside is the one area I don’t like. We have a bunch of ends and hybrid guys.
  11. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    That’s what I thought too. I figured I was just tripping , I forget a lot these days.
  12. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    I’ve realized awhile ago if you aren’t serving giant glasses of Kool Aid people might not agree lol. I saw it a lot last year lol.
  13. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    I could go get a video of Leonard Taylor, W Steed , Tyrique and others then go find a Cali kid drooling all over the place and use that as proof SFLA kids are smarter. I think that’s the point some are making. Not exactly a big sample size.
  14. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    Well that escalated quickly.
  15. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    It’s good but far from deep , if you think different you‘re hitting the hopium a tad hard. We can’t afford injuries at OL, Cb ( Tyrique ) , the interior DL or rb. If you think Jackson goes down we aren’t f’d you’re tripping. That throws that room into a mess. Safety and de are two positions we...
  16. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    we’d likely get what 99% of teams get when they play the elites. Thankfully there’s only a handful of those teams.
  17. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    If there’s more separation “ Graves sucks and is a jag”. Cis bro.
  18. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    Positionless. Lashlee was using him that way. Line him up at wr, rb , motion him in or out of backfield , use on end arounds, selling motion and even st’s. Hes the type of guy you have a handful of plays for every game. Even if it’s just using as a decoy.
  19. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    He did have a lot of drops but he finished the year really well. He made a lot of plays after the bad start. He lost some pt and it seemed to get his head straight.
  20. C

    Let’s talk wide receivers

    I put Smith in the same boat , I just see him more as gimmick guy. Just get him the ball in space.
Back
Top