Search results

Also, getting kids via normal recruitment or transfers; does it really matter? Transfers have become common and there are only more and more. The following kids were transfers during Coach L’s tenure: 1. Kadji 2. Larkin* 3. TMJ 4. Angel 5. Kam 6. Murphy 7. Sheldon This is some of our best talent.

No. There is nothing in between. There are only Joe Thomas or Bruce Brown types. Also, the FBI bullchit managed to hurt our roster BEFORE the investigation went public. The FBI was capable of going back in time and ***ing our roster. Amazing. No matter what, never use ALL of your...

I like how it is black or white. It is (A) or (B). There is no option (C). For those that aren’t biased homers and are able to discuss the program freely; it clearly is Option (C). Option (C) there were some roster management issues prior to the FBI bullchit AND the FBI only made an issue...

It is too complex for some. I’ve floated this Joe Thomas-type player numerous times. I still wait to hear the downside of taking someone like that. Apparently there is some benefit of leaving multiple ships open for numerous years and taking no one.

Exactly. 1. Our best teams have been when our players are older/more mature than our competition. So perhaps using more scholarships BEFORE would allow us to have more players available later. 2. If a team is X deep, it doesn't mean they ONLY use X scholarships to get to X deep. Also, just...

Two Old Posts: On Roster Management Post #1: https://www.canesinsight.com/threads/2019-20-rotation.151917/#post-4215670 Fact #1: The NCAA allows 13 scholarships for basketball. Fact #2: Since 2014-15 (the last 5 seasons), we've started the season using (on average) 10 active scholarships...

Brooks has an insanely serious condition called “Notin Europeitis”. The serious condition only impacts him in the USA. If we somehow played our games in Europe, where they have the cure, he would be fine for this year. As for the waiver, Coach L and Miami can’t be bothered with paperwork in...

The only options are (a) Anthony Mack or (b) open scholarship. That is it. Nothing else! Perhaps if we used our scholarships and these roster management issues weren’t prevalent long before the FBI bullchit; we wouldn’t be throwing away a season.

That whole post was sarcasm. He should be playing now.

Brooks is a once in a lifetime player. You must sit him and wait until he is about to turn 24 (he turned 23 in December) before you can consider playing him. He needs to be the oldest player by far on our team before he is ready to contribute. Plus Brooks isn't healthy. He was healthy ENOUGH to...

The first sentence makes no sense unless there is a reason why we should throw away a season. Players like Brooks are available often, he is not a rare talent and this transfer mess is only getting bigger (for NCAA players/bigger pool). Perhaps if we used more scholarships we would have more...

Learn the system?

Ugly

Walker is in!

For what? Being a freshman and making a mistake. What lesson are you teaching him?

Is he your candidate to transfer before next season? There is no reason NOT to play him. The minutes/burn are easily available. This game was over with 14 minutes left, instead of padding stats of sub-par players, think about the future.

Let me understand this: Sam was kind of injured. + Stone was a little off/minutes were limited + Duke was up by 20 with 14 left in the game (essentially at this point the game is likely over) = Don't play Walker

How about Walker and Wong? What is the point of not playing them?

x2

At least Stone is playing physical D on Carey.