Search results

They should have done this regardless of Brooks. At the very least, bring in some fillers. Bring in another player who needs to sit out. Bring in someone. Don't worry about the Potatoes on this board. These roster management issues have been there for along time and they were here before the...

So let’s talk about this injury...

It isn't. No one can question an irrational and illogical decision.

This potato joined in March and is crying about the discussion on the board.

Wow, our second person to claim to be an “insider” on this board. Cool beans! Ignoring whether this is true or not (sitting out because of injury), would you say it is illogical and irrational for a player to play in “useless” games if he wasn’t healthy then?

So you're claiming to be an insider?

Source? So why have him risk further injury by playing in “useless” games? Seems insanely illogical and irrational. If he is healthy to play in “useless” games, after the surgery, he is probably healthy to play for the season (months after said “useless” games). It would be negligent to risk a...

Why did he play in Europe?

Simply negligent to repeatedly not fill the class.

I can follow the convo. We still need a proven eligible quality big man. I am sorry you got hung up on the part about the "5".

Is this real life? We need a quality eligible proven big man. You want to call him a "big", whatever. The point remains. We have NONE as of right now.

With Tristan or without, we still need a proven eligible big man. Tristan isn't playing the 5 for us.

Who knows if we can get him? Also, we still need an eligible proven big man.

1. Without graduating, Brooks could try to get a waiver due to change in circumstances (e.g. his coach leaving). 2. Stone isn't a big man, if healthy. 3. None of those non-freshman (e.g. Sam, Gak and/or Miller) are proven big men. 4. Tristan, who knows if we can get him. Who knows if he will be...

Would be the only quality proven center, if eligible.