Search results

Please note this is my last post with you on this subject. Feel free to ignore my post and/or get the last word in. I am not going to read a response from you because there is no point. I didn't know it was critical thinking to disregard the actual facts, rearrange a set schedule (ACC) and...

You're right.

I disagree. I am done discussing your bullchit ACC stuff because it isn't a small difference, as there is a 26.6% difference in wins the last few years (as evidenced by the actual data). You can't have a discussion because you can't even accept facts. These are facts: 2015-16 First 9 Games...

That is comical coming from that ACC analysis where you switched the schedule and discount Newton's shot. Yet we still performed better in the second half. But let's move on to the substance and away from the bullchit you created. 1. We're not adding more losses. We're scheduling better teams...

It is extremely hard to have a conversation with you. Here is one example (bold above): I never said DECENT. Here is what was actually said (by me): You're still not understanding. Let's keep it simple: 1. Losing to crappy teams is bad. 2. Beating crappy teams does nothing. 3. Losing to...

You're still not understanding. Let's keep it simple: 1. Losing to crappy teams is bad. 2. Beating crappy teams does nothing. 3. Losing to good teams is not detrimental as it happens. More to come after the following. Side note: This was a regular season tourney, I am talking about...

Not wrong, but you’re still a ****. It must be comforting knowing that you’re a **** in real life as well as on here. What will your new handle be next?

Good morning Kunty, How many times are you going to start a new handle?

1. You are a tremendous ****. Regardless of how many times I say it. You know you’re a tremendous, smelly, gaping ****. 2. Why do you keep coming back? Why do you keep starting new handles? Is it because your **** smells? 3. 2014-15. You lose again. 4. How many handles did you start? 5?

Mark Little the banned whinny ****.

You've been here since May 2018. How would you know? Are you one of those tremendous whinny ***** that keeps getting banned? No ***ing way.

2014-15. We already saw what happens. We know what losing to bad non-conference opponents does.

The sad part is you can't read it. Even if you include the Wooden Classic, there is no guarantee. This isn't complex stuff.

1. If you actually read the post, it says "I'm ignoring any regular season tourney or the Big 10/ACC Challenge". The reason being is you can specifically pick your opponents in those things. You can actually pick your non-conference opponents when you schedule them. 2. As for the Wooden...

You don't get credit for beating teams with NO pulse BUT you get punished for losing to them. Do you see the difference? Just 1 or 2 teams. You know you can look this stuff up before you post? 2015-16 First 9 Games: 6-3 Second 9 Games: 7-2 2016-17 First 9 Games: 4-5 Second 9 Games: 6-3...

It is actually really simple. For the following, I'm ignoring any regular season tourney or the Big 10/ACC Challenge. 1. If you lose to any of these chit teams (bad losses), it hurts. Beating them does nothing, as it is expected. If we're on the fence or a true bubble team playing an OOC...

The OOC schedule gets even worse. Game One: So our opening game is against a team that went 13–19 (7–11) last year. Game Two: We then follow that up (assuming we win) with a game against one of: Northwestern 15–17 (6–12) or Fresno State 21–11 (11–7) *Fresno State has a new coach (Justin...

But Yale made the NCAAT 3 years ago!

At some point you have to think this is intentional.

You’re telling me we can find no quality teams?