Search results

  1. CashMoneyCane

    ESPN CHALK ARTICLE

    If you think I'm using that stat to say Miami doesn't win, you're far, far more clueless than I thought. And I NEVER, EVER bet against Miami on principle. Look at it this way. Of the last 26 posts I've read from you, 23 have been stupid. Without reading your next post, what do you expect...
  2. CashMoneyCane

    ESPN CHALK ARTICLE

    You would be right if we didn't have any access to data on our road games vs. unranked opponents OR home games, OR if the road results vs. unranked opponents OR our overall record was the same. Then it would be statistically insignificant, because those results are aligned with results from...
  3. CashMoneyCane

    ESPN CHALK ARTICLE

    Dumb. Indicative of zero knowledge of how statistics work. Once again, you have no idea what you're talking about. Please let me know when you take stats 101 though!
  4. CashMoneyCane

    ESPN CHALK ARTICLE

    There's absolutely nothing true about that. When I started working professionally in finance, one the very, very important phrases was "past performance does not indicate future results." While on a case by case basis this is true, on the whole, past performance is highly indicative of future...
  5. CashMoneyCane

    ESPN CHALK ARTICLE

    I'd say absolutely. Given the strength of the statistic relative to all games (which we're probably somewhere around .700 over that timeframe) it seems highly indicative of culture issues.
Back
Top