Search results

  1. Canesfan1899

    Canes Convos: Defense talks winning the "physical war" with LSU, players-only meetings

    I don't disagree with you but at the same time there are ton of variables that go into a defensive performance, time of possession, average starting field positon, turnovers, ECT. Personally, I feel like we rotate too many players and I would love to see the starters on the field more...
  2. Canesfan1899

    Canes Convos: Defense talks winning the "physical war" with LSU, players-only meetings

    Not a huge fan of Diaz at all and agree we need to be much better on third down, but if you don't think field position didn't play a part in the first half we will just have to agree to disagree. I was a Feagles apologist last year but that kid is not a D-1 punter, he gave them a short field 3...
  3. Canesfan1899

    Canes Convos: Defense talks winning the "physical war" with LSU, players-only meetings

    And they were on the field the whole freakn game. I agree that we need to play tighter man coverage, but we held Burrows under 50%, and if you look at the YPC it wasn't great despite a 50 yd td run. They weren't dominant but they performed well enough for us to win.
  4. Canesfan1899

    Canes Convos: Defense talks winning the "physical war" with LSU, players-only meetings

    I'll say it again, the defense played well enough to win the game. We got burned on a blitz for a long TD run but other than that the defense did a decent job, the offense and Feagles put the defense on a short field the whole night.
Back
Top