Search results

  1. C

    The Alliance votes down CFP expansion…

    No, but it accumulates over time. As an example, in the 8 years of the college playoff, if there were 12 teams selected each year, the SEC would have had 24 participants, the Big 10 would have had 23, the Big XII 15, ACC 13, and Pac12 12. The ACC would have had 2 fewer participants than the...
  2. C

    The Alliance votes down CFP expansion…

    I agree with you unfortunately, but I think bringing in ND is the only way the ACC would be able to save itself as a major conference. Playoff expansion would effectively kill that last bit of hope.
  3. C

    The Alliance votes down CFP expansion…

    Of course not relying solely on Clemson would be ideal, but we are not in that situation. The ACC has to play the hand it currently has and make decisions accordingly. No one is saying the ACC's revenue would be reduced with playoff expansion. What you can say is it will not go up as fast...
  4. C

    The Alliance votes down CFP expansion…

    I'm not sure why you think the Alliance would have no power in 2025, even with a simple majority needed for changes. Now, if the Big 10 drops out, yes, I would agree with you, but 3 of the top 4 conferences would offset the sway of the SEC and some of the Group of 5 are already against the...
  5. C

    The Alliance votes down CFP expansion…

    I'm more interested in seeing how the negotiations go for post-2025. This is just kicking the can down the road for 2 years. The next agreement will truly tell the future of college football. If the ACC acquiesces and they go to 12 teams, I see the ACC slowly diminishing as ND will no longer...
Back
Top