Search results

  1. C

    Dan Enos by the Numbers

    I hear ya', but the stats I put up, for the most part, correlate to offensive success.
  2. C

    Dan Enos by the Numbers

    Nope, He's on the clock now. If His offense is worth a ****, we should expect improvement by the end of the season at the very least.
  3. C

    Dan Enos by the Numbers

    True, and efficiency goes back to YPP. Sure a top rated offense will have games where YPP will be hard to come by, but I'd rather deal with 2nd & 2 or 3, than 2nd & 7 or 8 all day.
  4. C

    Dan Enos by the Numbers

    Sorta disagree...as demonstrated by the stats that I put up, teams that convert on 3rd down a lot, for the most part, rank anywhere from the bottom half, to dead last in 3rd down attempts per game. So given that, I'll go out on a limb and say those teams are the leaders in average yds. per 1st...
  5. C

    Dan Enos by the Numbers

    Since the CFBP started, here's the 3rd down attempts PG rankings, 3rd attempts PG, & 3rd down conversion percentage: 14'-15': Alabama - 84th/14.2/8th FSU - 115th/12.9/23rd OSU - 114th/13.1/3rd Oregon - 104th/13.6/6th 15'-16': Alabama - 78th/14.4/99th Clemson - 34th/15.1/13th MSU - 73/14.6/7th...
  6. C

    Dan Enos by the Numbers

    I've always thought 3rd down was kinda overrated. Of course you want to convert em' when you get em', but if you look at the best offenses in the Country, they're usually at the bottom in 3rd down ATTEMPTS. The name of the game on O is to get 1st downs, not 3rd downs.
Back
Top