Search results

Or you guys could just be better moderators.

I got a warning for one of my posts in this thread. This board is such a joke.

Sure, pal. :ROFLMAO:

Of course nobody said that. If I have to explain the silliness of your two posts, I will. But it just proves how shallow you are. In May of last year you claimed that the program was ruined. Now that the team is in the hunt for a host spot with a team of Freshmen and Sophomores, you're...

This is the kind of dodge one should expect from someone like you. You can't give an example, or articulate your point well enough, so you just throw out this weak nonsense. The example you gave of the "Sunday" Louisville game was wrong.

I was banned. Just catching up before the next one.

That doesn't cover for the sheer silliness of the thread topic.

Yep. I definitely did. But I couldn't have done it without your silliness.

The kind of response you get from someone who has absolutely no defense for the silly things he said.

The guy who said on May 25, 2018, that the program was "ruined" is the same guy who is now wondering, 11 months later, when we're going to be elite again. Can't make this stuff up. It's gold.

I love how you made the epic "4-8 in 12 games = poorly coached" post and then disappeared for over a month only to return and have this be your reintroduction. You claimed that we lost a Sunday game to Louisville when there was no Sunday game and then you claim that a pitching decision cost us...

It's complete nonsense. They basically lost two starters this weekend and still almost won the series. The pitching plan was actually good and they got almost exactly what they wanted in game 3. They had both Federman and Veliz available for long outings with the lead in the 6th inning. But...

I love that the other poster says that the coach has to start "trusting" other kids as if that's the solution. Just throw somebody out there and "trust" them. It's hard to trust even the oldest, best pitchers in the bullpen. But just "trust" some random kid to get it done. Good one. So when...

It's like nobody ever thinks about the fact that what they're saying might look really stupid in 5 minutes. They just say it anyway and then when it blows up they just continue to believe it.

Someone was up. He then came in and gave up 3 runs.

Because it's a 9-inning game and you can't just yank your starter at the first sign of trouble. So you would've been good with Federman/Veliz going out there in the 4th and giving up 5 runs? It's just a silly criticism that was made to look stupid about 20 minutes later.

The guys you were screaming for Gino to put out there in Van Belle's place gave up 5 runs. You seem to have no ability to understand cause and effect or that one decision then leads to an outcome. It's dumb to say he left Van Belle in too long when your solution gave up 5 runs in relief.

Of course you can't name a single coaching issue. You just assume it. How has age and experience done for Zamora, Toral and Gil so far?

Turning a 10-run margin into a 5-run win is such silly criticism. It was done for a purpose. To save the two best arms for game 2. So when we were in a close situation (which we were) we could go to our best arms. Those arms gave up 5 runs. There weren't any management blunders. We just...

There weren't any incompetent management decisions. People just turn their brains off and have no ability to understand what's going on.