Search results

See my last post. It's at the end.

I poorly expressed that with "generalizing." More akin to moving the goalposts into normative judgments.

In my field, there are many women who start out fresh out of grad school, but fewer and fewer once you get to my age (36). They do not continue to put in the same level of intensity and the long hours that men do. The ones who do so are very exceptional, and not the rule. I think you are...

I was basically posting a lecture skeleton from a course I took for cross-credit in Bio/Psych/Cul Anth. If someone wants to argue with it, take it up with Chaz Darwin.

Are you responding to something I said?

I would outlaw public sector unions.

1) I believe only net taxpayers should be able to vote in federal elections. I do not care if that opinion makes me controversial; 2) IQ of the sexes comes out about even if we are talking about averages, but that is highly misleading, because: a) When looking at the extremes of the...

See my prior post.

1) Guard the schools; 2) Be better parents; 3) Stop outsourcing child-rearing to pills and babysitters; 4) Don't have kids if you can't afford the time, money, and energy to do #2 and #3.

That's the point. I've just explained what red flag laws are, in practice. Why would I advocate, or willingly agree to any of this? You're not addressing my question. After answering that question, be specific as to how my ownership of firearms constitutes a violation of anyone's rights...

Why would I voluntarilyy submit to being put on a list, accessible by any state agency or law enforcement actor, decided by bureaucratic fiat, and only appealable (at best) in front of administrative court judges (almost entirely female, btw)? Explain why I should do this willingly.

Not really sure what you're looking for. You can also read the thousands of pages historian Ian Kershaw has dedicated to the subject of **** Germany, including electoral support for the *****, as well as popular opinion as to specific policy measures. If you want to search 20th century...

I am a practicing lawyer but my educational background is history and political science. This paragraph is so beyond incorrect, you should retract it in its entirety.

There is no society in the world without firearms. The only question is who is sufficiently privileged to keep one. My defense is my responsibility. This is a responsibility that many do not want to accept. I accept it, and I also accept that there is danger and uncertainty in the world...

Many of our political class (and citizens for that matter) want to see the complete eradication of civilian firearms ownership, sale, and use. They simply can't go all the way yet, so use half measures in the interim.