Search results

  1. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    People dropping Renfrow in here...he became an awesome wide receiver...but he was also a walk-on. He was an FCS recruit. His athletic profile is nothing special either. He's an anomaly. If you're going to mention Renfrow for your 'well actually' post...why don't we just start talking about...
  2. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    So, you went from "these guys suck" and my response was "those guys would have actually been the best WRs on this team" with trying to pick out some outliers of guys that don't work out and were buried on the depth chart. You're missing the point entirely. Yeah, some of those guys will...
  3. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    Even our tall bums are more serviceable than our midget bums, which is probably the in summary of my entire post. Guys like Leggett and Ryan Moore are WR1 on this team right now. At times, they were legit 20%+ marketshare WRs. They clearly are not up to standard, but it is what it is. I'd...
  4. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    I'll take elite route running and elite speed, too. When you have neither, be tall?
  5. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    You've got to aspire to be at the top if you want to be at the top. Top teams have monster WRs. They aren't all manchildren like Tee Higgins, but they're often stacked with a variety of skillsets, but in pro bodies. People in here are really "whale actually...ALABAMA" as if they aren't all...
  6. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    Listen man, I'm selling stock in the whole **** room. Not a position room on the team has been more underwhelming with as many headaches as the WR Room. Constant problems. KJ Osborn's role here has legit been damning to the entire unit. Look at the attrition, too. Hightower, Ezzard, Njoku...
  7. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    Tommy Streeter would have been WR1. Not even playing around. Tommy Streeter's Junior year he was a 29% / 38% marketshare WR. I know brother @HighSeas has gotten some **** about Lawrence Cager...but Lawrence Cager would have been at minimum WR1a on this team. LaRon Byrd was like WR3/WR4 on...
  8. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    Yeah, man. Waddle is 5'10" with lifts in his shoes...but has out of control short area quickness and is slippery af. He's also their WR4. Jeudy, Smith, and Ruggs are in the hair under 6-foot-2 to hair above 6'0" range and all have incredibly exceptional qualities and skills. We don't even...
  9. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    He quit on this team. If you don't see the difference, idk what to tell you.
  10. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    If you're 6'2" or shorter for this thread, you a midget. Sorry. My thread, my rules. He's not 6'3"/6'4" like the guy above you was trying to say about Smith, Jeudy, and Ruggs, which was supposed to be a "well actually" about not recruiting tall wide receivers. /I was being facetious
  11. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    Their Top 4 are all SPECIAL and feature 4 Day 1 or Day 2 picks. CeeDee Lamb is a midget...but SPECIAL. Brother...you are either special or you have size...as stated in the post above...which you couldn't have read it that fast...you got to LSU and Clemson and thought you had a cute WHALE...
  12. B

    Let's Talk WR Recruiting - Prioritizing SIZE

    tl;dr -- TALL BOYS ONLY...here's why. Just going to start this off by stating THE STANDARD. The standard is Clemson and LSU. LSU's starting WRs followed by listed size followed by marketshare of YARDS / TDS Ja'Marr Chase (6'1" 200) - 28% / 32% Justin Jefferson (6'3" 192) - 26% / 32% Terrance...
Back
Top