Search results

Correct, all teams misevaluate talent, even Nick Saban. Using 247 recruiting rankings do not point an accurate picture of what a team looks like. The recruiting rankings are only demonstrating what kind of talent rank these players have the moment they have left high school. This means, Akheem...

The argumentation is that teams perform accordingly to their 247 talent ranking, making 247 therefore an accurate database for talent ranking. I have successfully denied this. Out of the data that I have presented, it is logic to suggest that good coaching has something to do with a teams...

Please, dear lord, let some brain come down on Planet Earth...

The specials? They are called Bowl Games, are sponsored and the media and ad revenue bring in a ****load of money. But yeah, no one talks about Boise State upsetting Oklahoma in the Fiesta Bowl. My mistake.

"247 makes accurate rankings" "I only care about 1st and 2nd, the rest doesn't matter to me"

Buy a mirror then.

You need help. Consult a doctor.

247 got exposed for putting the values for Miami commits down after they committed to us on a consistent basis and people still use their database as an argument?

You're insulting everyone in here disagreeing with you, yet we are the internet tough boys? Bet lol

And don't even say 247 analysis is good analysis because they can identify the most athletic human beings on a high school football field. I don't need to work for 247 to identify Derrick Henry, Shemar Stewart, Leonard Taylor or Francis Mauigoa as elite talent.

Ending this once and for all with the 2021 final rankings. 1. Georgia - 2nd in talent 2. Bama - 1st 3. Michigan - 15th 4. Cinci - not ranked 5. Baylor - 41st 6. Ohio State - 3rd 7. Oklahoma State - 47th 8. Notre Dame -12th 9. Michigan State - 37th 10. Oklahoma - 6th 11. Ole Miss - 27th 12. Utah...

Yes, correct. If you evaluate a set of data and the evaluation produces inconsistent results with the same metric and evaluation process being used, either the evaluation is flawed or the data. In both instances: Its inconsistent and cannot be used for further research. I just posted several...

LSU, A&M and Texas are not Top 10 teams at the moment. Florida State certainly isn't a Top 20 right now and neither is South Carolina. But oh look, Kentucky, the 27th ranked team in talent, is ranked 8th! Oh wonder? Almost as if certain teams dont recruit highly according to 247 but they still...

The amount of times where @Liberty City El and @gogeta4 were standing on the table and almost begging Miami to offer certain players who weren't as highly ranked as others but were straight up dogs has gotten so big, people could write a book about it. Now, we have a talented WR room, because...

The mere fact that there are examples in both directions quite clearly proves that 247 rankings are not a reliable metric of evaluating players, because they are inconsistent - or random, as a matter of fact. The second fact that you blatantly choose to ignore is the fact that these receivers...

Mark Pope was a highly ranked 4-star. Al Blades was a highly ranked 4-star. Navaughn Donaldson was a highly ranked 4-star. Ainias Smith from the Aggies was a mid 3-star. Restrepo was a 3-star. Recruiting rankings made by 247 do not mean crap.

Oh my god, why do y'all keep trying to make arguments with 247 sports rankings, good grief...

Oh, I am now comfortable with him. He's better than expected. Lets just not use win pct, please 🥺

Tua has made some strides but pls let's not use win pct as a QB stat. I'll have to pull out Tim Tebow then and I don't want to do that.

Georgia had so many chances of killing that game off... that pick by Raekwon changed the whole game.