Search results

Ok, maybe my first comment on this thread didn't portray my complete response enough. But I'll go ahead and make it make sense, since a lot of people read it and ignored the post that I actually quoted. Poster made a comment on the conditions of players returning: My reply to that comment...

Are you saying football makes 0 effort to mitigate these things while continuing with the sport? Same way Clemson is making an effort to mitigate being responsible for worst case scenario? Oh, and lets not forget that playing football injuries could make things worse....nah, they don't...

Lol, the likelihood of that actually happening is very slim, and I don't think it actually will. But the point was that there's a chance, and nobody wants to be the university that it happens to. So, you can't really blame them for taking these measures. Don't know, I don't watch CNN or any...

Imagine inviting all your players back, just to do a pre-screening and have a group of 30 students get infected, 7 that actually shows symptoms, and 1 that ends up dying.