Search results

Because the media says so? Or because they didn't beat out 2 freshman that just allowed 10 sacks?

This pretty much makes my point. Neal beat out people ranked lower than him. So in other words, its fair to say that Neal walked into a situation where he was more talented than the guys ahead of him, and capitalized it into a starting spot. On the other hand, Zion beat out players ranked higher...

So when its Miami, our dudes "arent that good" to get beat by a True Frosh, but for any other team it's whatever. Miami is NOWHERE NEAR the only school that started a TRUE FRESHMAN at OT in Week 0/1.

Evan Neal is starting at Bama. Does that mean there wasn't talented people there? OR that he's the best option? mind you he isn't even at his natural position

The talent is there. Last year the scheme was the reason the OL sucked. This year I thought it was pretty blatant that the UF DL jumping the snap, coupled with our True Frosh LT coming off the ball late against a SR was pretty evident.

Watching Scaife last year, I thought RT was his money position. Still think he can excel there. Would've loved if we just had a strong right side with Donaldson/Scaife combo to run behind, and knowing that the opposing defense would prefer to attack the inexperienced/least talented left side.