Search results

Right, because our assessment of coaches change as time goes on and they go elsewhere and seemingly look good. Look, I don't know if Hurtt is any good or not. I have no opinion on that. But, dudes much smarter than me must think he's at least a capable position coach b/c he has ascended from an...

LMAO. I am showing my age!

No. That is not correct. I've been on this board a long time and folks on here cussed Stoutland out repeatedly. He coached under Randy and everything and everyone under Randy looked like trash. The idea that this board of all places was complimentary of Stoutland but critical of everything else...

I don't want to "cape" (that's the hot term now, right?) for Hurtt, but everyone needs to soft pedal on the notion he's a bad DL coach. First, save for maybe a couple folks, most here can't assess d-line play. Next, position coaches look crappy under crappy head coaches. ****, ironically...

Best case is always someone seasoned. But it seems like CFB coaches and coordinators are younger and younger. There is just seemingly more movement (upward and lateral) than there ever has been. The likelihood of a first time coordinator is seemingly more likely in this day and age than ever.

Wait a sec. To play devil's advocate, why is Hurtt a bad choice but Schulman who is co-DC but what I understand is, he hasn't called plays either, ok?