Search results

In fairness, at least in the segments I've watched, a lot of his runs are designed pass plays where he just decides to take off. From what I've seen, he's not a particularly patient passer. If it's not there, he's off. It'll be key for the D line to contain.

Undoubtedly. I think we're going to be doing a lot of moping about the defense on Monday but I think the reality is it's a productive offense that will move the ball against any level of competition. We're going to need to put up 35+ IMO to win.

That's not what I said at all. He's an effective QB. They will move the ball against us and get first downs and score points. I posted elsewhere they're 16th in the country in first downs. My point is that what I've seen-and the stats bear out-that it's not a sophisticated, downfield passing...

Look at the game logs. 7-13. 11-15. 17-33. 10-10. 20-27. He hasn't thrown for more than 223 in a single game. It's not a downfield passing game from what I've seen this year. He throws safe passes because he doesn't need to force the ball with his ability to run. /now assuredly going off for...

But their best effort will still lead to yards and points. VT can move the ball. Not an electric offense, but they can grind you out in small chunks. If we win, I see a high scoring game, 47-34 or so. I think VT will score. They're 24th in the country in YPG and 16th in first downs. I don't...

I've watched a little VT this year. VT reminds me of GT under Paul Johnson, albeit more sophisticated. They run the ball well, both w/ their backs and QB, and are able to constantly move the sticks. Hooker is not a great passer, but they don't ask him to make particularly challenging throws...