Search results

Jeezus we've reached the inner rings of ****, otherwise known as June on football message boards. This is going to be a long summer. lol

I think I misunderstood your post. Regardless, not sure what you're trying to say. Are you saying asexual women are unable to reproduce? As for hermaphroditic reproducers, I really wasn't debating that (and not sure what the relevance), but since you brought it up, I googled it and found...

I mean male seahorses give birth to their babies so there's that. :)

Not sure why the full stop? I'll disagree with the wide net you're throwing. Human evolution is not an exact science and with billions upon billions, you're going to get some genetic differences in all of us, which goes against your theory that homo sapiens as a species is cut one way - it's...

So, if it (homesexuality) is chemical (or genetic) and that is the same issue with trans people (chemical/genetic) - ie they are born this way -- why are trans considered different in your book than homosexuals?

Is this how you would describe homosexuality?

Maybe there are already.

Thought this sort of stuff is interesting. Lots of "it's not just an XX/XY issue" science around. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/02/200205084203.htm